Steven JW Kennedy

My Blog

Archive for November 12th, 2010

A Cool Feature of Windows 7

Posted by Steven Kennedy on November 12, 2010


One of the cool new features of Windows 7 that I find myself using a lot is what Microsoft have termed ‘Snap’. It allows you to size and arrange a window just by dragging it to the edge of your screen, well the top, left and right edges anyway.

This is a great way to quickly and easily arrange two windows on a single screen by dragging each of them to the left and right screen edges. You’ll then have each window open, arranged and sized to use half of the screen.

As I’m writing this I have Widows Live Writer open as well as the Microsoft web page describing ‘Snap’.

The Microsoft site can give you more details of how to use the Snap feature. For the moment I find that I just use the snap to left or right so I can have two windows open at the same time and the Snap to the top edge to maximize the window to fill the screen, same as double clicking the windows top border.

Posted in General | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Online Backup systems in a Corporate Environment

Posted by Steven Kennedy on November 12, 2010


These days people get bombarded with adverts via the TV, email etc. to ‘protect’ their PC’s, more specifically the data on it, by using an Online Backup system such as Carbonite. So what happens if you have a company provided PC? What’s to stop you signing up for such a service on the basis that you’re ‘”just protecting the PC” and “it’ll help the company if they have to recover/re-build my PC”.

Well in some corporate environments they stop users from installing un-approved software but in a lot of companies laptop users get have local admin access and hence can install software themselves. In an environment where users have the privileges to install software what might some of the repercussions be, to a company who’s employees make use of such a service?

Well two potential issues immediately spring to mind;

  • Electronically Stored Information (ESI)
  • Visibility to Legal action

Now the would seem to be the same and they are somewhat related but for the purposes of this blog entry I’m treating them as different.

In the case of ESI if your company has to go to Federal court these days they may need to provide information to the court as to where the company stores information along with some indication of how long it will take to retrieve information pertinent to the case and in what formats. So what’s going to happen if an employee has been backing up their PC using an online service, is the company likely to know about it? If they don’t is there an obligation on the employee to tell them if they’re part of a case? What happens if the company is keeping the case close held and the employee/s aren’t informed that they’re part of some sort of litigation? What’s the court going to say if (when) they find out?.

In the second case, visibility to legal action, I’ll alluding to whether or not the company/employee in question might be kept in the dark if they’re being investigated. If law enforcement knows, or suspects, that employees and or the company stores information using an online backup service how protected is that information from them? Would it be possible for law enforcement to get a ‘search warrant’, or whatever the appropriate legal device is, that would allow them to go to the service provider and demand the information without either law enforcement, or the service provider, telling the employee/company that they are doing so?

Before you think I might be going off the rails here, law enforcement agency’s already have a mechanism to request and implement wire tapping, without the targets being informed. Online storage of information is a new and untested waters when it comes to who can access your information. Something else to think about, if you store information in the ‘cloud’, essentially at a third party, have you given up any rights to privacy? Do you know where that data is stored? Is it in the same State, even the same Country (probably but ..). What laws might be broken by transmitting data that’s evidence in a case over State lines.

Lots of questions about using using these online backup systems and so far I don’t believe there’s much in the way of legal precedent. Of course any lawyer reading this and who knows better is free to correct me, as is any of the online backup/cloud providers.

Posted in General | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Online ‘Friends’, or should we say iFriends?

Posted by Steven Kennedy on November 12, 2010


Have you noticed that with the explosion of social networks, Facebook, MySpace etc. that the word ‘friend’ seems to be some what devalued. Now days, via social networks, you can have a lot of so called friends whom you’ve never met. You only know them through the social network site, Instant Messages, email, SMS etc.

Perhaps we should coin a different word for these kinds of friends. as everything seems to be prefixed either with an ‘e’ or an ‘i’ when it comes to Internet related products and applications how about ‘iFriends’?

Now, up front I’d have to point out that the ‘ifriends’ is already in use to some extent. A Google search provided a total of almost 600,00 hits, with the top entries being for an adult web site. Now I haven’t checked them all out but the top hits don’t show it being used as a descriptor for Internet friends, which is what I’m suggesting it be used for.

I even checked Wikipedia and the only hits on it where with respect to the adult social network iFriends.

So lets see if we can get the word iFriends adopted for use where it refers to people you’ve met and ‘friended’ online but with whom may or may not have met in person.

Posted in Commentary | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »